From: "Wayne" <wjackson AT powerup DOT com DOT au>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Networking Ninny solicits help
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 13:21:05 +1100
Message-ID: <01bd01ed$9b128100$c8c8a8c0@client.whack.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Win95 is not good for a server as it is only 16bit/32bit.  It is slow using
any protocol.

However Win95 is fast enough for a small 3 computer network, any more you
will need NT 3.51 at least.

It is much easier though to use Win95 as a server for Win95 than for any
other OS.

Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Mr M S Aitchison <physmsa AT cantua DOT canterbury DOT ac DOT nz>
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Friday, December 05, 1997 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Networking Ninny solicits help


>
>I think it was possible to set Win95 up for "File and printer sharing
>for Netware networks" then use the personal netware on the OpenDOS side
>simply as a (non-personal) netware client. Unfortunately I can't check
>this at the moment because W95 doesn't let me have netware serving
>running while the PC I can play with is sharing via the Microsoft
>network standard (and I can't turn that off at the moment).
>
>Has somebody tried this?
>
>And, while I know that the OpenDOS side can do diskless booting
>(assuming the correct ROM in the network card), I'm not sure if Win95
>can be a suitable server.  Again, somebody might be able to tell us for
>sure.
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Mark Aitchison,                 \_   Phone: +64 3 364-2947 home 337-1225
>Dept of Physics & Astronomy,    </     Fax: +64 3 364-2469  or  364-2999
>University of Canterbury,      /)   E-mail: phys169 AT csc DOT canterbury DOT ac DOT nz
>Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND.    (/'     www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/~physmsa
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>