Message-Id: <199709251350.MAA28572@lince.las.es>
From: "Rafa Gawenda" <rgawenda AT pobox DOT com>
To: "Mutiny" <mutiny AT hardlink DOT com>
Cc: "opendos AT delorie DOT com" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 97 12:53:08 -0200
Reply-To: "Rafa Gawenda" <rgawenda AT pobox DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: tail dos implementation?
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 24 Sep 1997 21:55:04 -0400 (EDT), Mutiny wrote:

>> Do not exit at EOF and wait for new data forever.

>What he probably wants to do is monitor a file (ala /var/syslog in linux)
>for changes but I doubt they would because DOS doesn't multitask like
>Linux does, and never will.

I agree... there're a lot of utilities out there, TSR programs that monitors COM ports or records events, which 
generate log files.

--
Rafa Gawenda, <rgawenda AT pobox DOT com>
PGP: (1024/BD2D5E31) A2 89 82 BC 8A B3 B7 10  35 36 68 A9 28 8C 65 88