To: ralsina AT unl DOT edu DOT ar
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970922113344 DOT 168J-100000 AT ultra7 DOT unl DOT edu DOT ar>
Message-Id: <AFQzf9q8a4@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 20:39:54 +0400 (MSD)
Organization: Locus
Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject: Re: source code
Lines: 17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

X-Comment-To: Roberto Alsina

Hi!

22-óÅÎ-97 11:34 ralsina AT unl DOT edu DOT ar (Roberto Alsina) wrote to opendos AT delorie DOT com:
 > On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
 > > 22-˜Š¾-97 10:45 rgawenda AT pobox DOT com (Rafa Gawenda) wrote to "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>:

 > >  > Perhaps someone could read in your words either that Linux isn't
 > > efficient (do you know some kernel better than that one) or even worse, that
 > > Linus should rewrite it in ASM (-:
 > >      Compare Linux and QNX - by speed and by requirements.
 > I hope you are not suggesting QNX is written in ASM...

     Independently source language QNX works faster (this is true realtime
OS) and requires _very_ small - only some dozens Kb for kernel, and not some
Mb for work without swap. But this is cost very much...