To: rgawenda AT pobox DOT com
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <199709221149 DOT KAA29070 AT lince DOT las DOT es>
Message-Id: <ADJ2d9qil6@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 17:20:19 +0400 (MSD)
Organization: Locus
Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject: Re: source code
Lines: 25
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

X-Comment-To: Rafa Gawenda

Hi!

22-σΕΞ-97 10:50 rgawenda AT pobox DOT com (Rafa Gawenda) wrote to "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>:
 > On Sun, 21 Sep 1997 19:46:24 +0400 (MSD), Arkady V.Belousov wrote:

 > > > I'm glad that Operating Systems aren't written by "novices". Aren't you?
 > >     When I work with MS's programs, I cry. You think, MS's developers, for
 > >example, are "advanced"?
 > Mmm. I was sure that all Windows were NOT coded by developers.

     Wow. Who "code all Windows" by you?

 > Does Microsoft have those people? BTW... did someone looked at the side
of the printed label in the diskettes of Windows 3.1?! It says "Operative
System".

     "If sign on a cell with elephant in Zoo say "tiger" - don't beleive
your eyes" - Kozma Prutkov.

P.S. Win3 is no more than intelligent grphical shell for DOS, like, for
example, DOS Shell, WPS in OS/2 (although multitasking in OS/2 presented
without WPS and PM), GEM or DesqView. Moreover, Win95 is not too far from
this.