Message-Id: <199709180045.TAA01379@fly.HiWAAY.net> Reply-To: From: "Kurt Wall" To: "Mike A. Harris" Cc: Subject: Re: For Sale or For Free: The Debate Continues Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 19:43:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk ---------- > From: Mike A. Harris > To: Kurt Wall > Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com > Subject: Re: For Sale or For Free: The Debate Continues > Date: Wednesday, September 17, 1997 2:37 PM > > On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Kurt Wall wrote: > > > >I thought it would be great to have the sources for DOS, and thus became > > >interested in OpenDOS and helped spread the word about it. I went to > > >great lengths to inform as many people about it as possible. I spent a - HUGE SNIP - > Now isn't all of what I just said true? Read the mailing list > archives. I've paid my dues to Caldera for the "free" binary of > OpenDOS and kernel source a hundred times over. > > *THAT* is MORE than enough gratitude from me towards them IMHO. > > If you disagree that I've expended enough gratitude to them now, > please feel free to point out what I should have done to show > more gratitude? Should I fly to England and kiss Noorda's feet > and put Caldera posters up in every room of my house? > > Please explain where I failed to be gratuitous. > > > Mike A. Harris | Homepage: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris > Computer Consultant | Am I online? - finger or ping capslock.dyn.ml.org > My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html > Mark should get a sound card and more ISA slots!!!!!!!! ;o) Mike, you are correct. Even grateful, clearly. But never "gratuitous," I hope. I did my research as you suggested (not in depth, I confess) and you were a very busy man. I reiterate that we are all embarassed. Given the way OD has performed on my machine (VCPI and EMM386 come to mind), I am quite disappointed, too. I hoped for much better. I retract. Kurt