Message-Id: <199709172352.WAA16191@lince.las.es>
From: "Rafa Gawenda" <rgawenda AT pobox DOT com>
To: "-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>,
        "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Cc: "opendos AT delorie DOT com" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 97 22:54:17 -0200
Reply-To: "Rafa Gawenda" <rgawenda AT pobox DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: CP/M web site looking for CP/M-86
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997 14:58:17 -0400 (EDT), Mike A. Harris wrote:

>> > Yes, it's better typying "for %%1 in *.* do type %1" (PC /MS DOS) than "type *.*" DR/Novell/Open DOS.
>> > This is only one of the one hundred advantages of this "free" DOS.
>> 
>> I don't care. I never do. I type "cat *" on any of those.
>
>Heheheh.  Me too.  When you install 4DOS and some UNIX utilities
>on ANY DOS version, the differences tend to be less important.

What are we talking about... Corel Draw of a DOS Operating System?!
Install IBM PCDOS 7.0 and Caldera OpenDOS 7.01 and compare then.
Both are more or less buggy, but one of them has more power builtin, and IT multitasks. The other one... pff!

--
Rafa Gawenda, <rgawenda AT pobox DOT com>
PGP: (1024/BD2D5E31) A2 89 82 BC 8A B3 B7 10  35 36 68 A9 28 8C 65 88