To: rgawenda AT pobox DOT com
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <199709171348 DOT MAA05528 AT lince DOT las DOT es>
Message-Id: <AAcq18qiV7@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization: International Brownian Movement
From: "-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 97 21:10:46 +0300
Subject: Re: CP/M web site looking for CP/M-86
Lines: 29
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

nuqneH,

> From: "Rafa Gawenda" <rgawenda AT pobox DOT com>
> To: "opendos AT delorie DOT com" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 97 09:11:37 -0200
> Subject: Re: CP/M web site looking for CP/M-86

[dd]

> >So.. OpenDOS will _never_  be multitasking OS..
> >Too bad.
>
> It's multitasking on my box...

_It?_ Or Desqview/taskmgr/anything? Did you compare?

>
> >Does anybody know any details?
> >
> >..i am starting to think maybe it's better to return to PC DOS 7?
>
> Yes, it's better typying "for %%1 in *.* do type %1" (PC /MS DOS) than "type *.*" DR/Novell/Open DOS.
> This is only one of the one hundred advantages of this "free" DOS.

I don't care. I never do. I type "cat *" on any of those.
--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|