To: bd733 AT rgfn DOT epcc DOT Edu
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <9709120326 DOT AA18173 AT rgfn DOT epcc DOT Edu>
Message-Id: <ADshF6q8NF@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:19:02 +0400 (MSD)
Organization: Locus
Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject: Re: ClosedDOS???
Lines: 15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

X-Comment-To: Jason M. Daniels

Hi!

11-σΕΞ-97 21:26 bd733 AT rgfn DOT epcc DOT edu (Jason M. Daniels) wrote to ark AT mos DOT ru:

 > >     Some think, this because no one (!), capable to port gcc,
 > > interesting by this. :(
 > gcc assumes, to the core of its being, a 32-bit architechture. To get gcc
 > to output 16-bit code would not be a 'port,' it would be a complete
 > rewrite. You might as well start from scratch. There -are-, btw, a few
 > good freeware 16-bit compilers availible.

     With last CD2 C++? I think, up to now remains only Watcom with full DOS
spport. But they cost.