To: ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <341 AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Message-Id: <ABEfF6q8NF@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:16:14 +0400 (MSD)
Organization: Locus
Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject: Re: ClosedDOS???
Lines: 16
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

X-Comment-To: -= ArkanoiD =-

Hi!

12-σΕΞ-97 02:53 ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru (-= ArkanoiD =-) wrote to crough45 AT amc DOT de:
 > In message <97Sep11.134613gmt+0100 DOT 11651 AT internet01 DOT amc DOT de> Christopher Croughton writes:

 > > > I am now thinking on switching back to PC DOS 7.. if the hope is completely
 > > > lost.
 > > What's the difference between that and MSDOD 6.22?
 > First,it is not M$.
 > Second,it has rexx and some other features..
 > Speaking on M$ versions,i'd prefer 5.0 - much better than 6.22..

     No. 6.22 better, than 5.0 - at least, kernel uses lesser memory and
6.22 have multiconfig.