To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970909110446 DOT 572B-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Message-Id: <ABzHR5qaa8@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 00:41:33 +0400 (MSD)
Organization: Locus
Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject: Re: ClosedDOS???
Lines: 14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

X-Comment-To: Mike A. Harris

Hi!

9-σΕΞ-97 11:12 mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca (Mike A. Harris) wrote to -= ArkanoiD =- <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>:
 > On Mon, 8 Sep 1997, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:

 > > > I ask this:  What good is having the kernel sources if one cannot
 > > > update the utility set to accomodate new kernel features?
 > > > Could someone please explain this.
 > > Drop it away. Completely or nearly so. Use GNU utilities set instead ;).
 > > It does look more like _Open_DOS, right?

     GNU not have compiler for DOS platform without DOS extender.