To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970828071315 DOT 2824A-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Message-Id: <AAYr25qS78@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization: International Brownian Movement
From: "-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date: Mon,  8 Sep 97 19:52:50 +0300
Subject: Re: ClosedDOS???
Lines: 23
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

nuqneH,

> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 03:44:37 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> X-Sender: mharris AT capslock DOT com
> Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> To: OpenDOS discussion list <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
> Subject: ClosedDOS???

[dd]

> I ask this:  What good is having the kernel sources if one cannot
> update the utility set to accomodate new kernel features?
>
> Could someone please explain this.

Drop it away. Completely or nearly so. Use GNU utilities set instead ;).
It does look more like _Open_DOS, right?

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|