Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 23:18:23 +1200 From: Perry Posted-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 23:18:23 +1200 Message-Id: <199707091118.XAA01859@bart.hn.pl.net> To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Subject: . Precedence: bulk Some comments (quickly, while I can post :) * We should have a way of booting various different kernals. eg: IBMBIO.SYS (for XT's) IBMDOS.SYS COMMAND.COM IBMBIO2.SYS (for 286's) IBMBIO2P.SYS (for 286's with kernal above 1mb) IBMDOS2.SYS IBMDOS2P.SYS CMD286.COM (/EXE) CMD286P.COM (/EXE) IBMBIO3.SYS (for 386's) IBMBIO3P.SYS (for protected mode) IBMDOS3.SYS IBMDOS3P.SYS CMD386.COM (/EXE) CMD386P.COM (/EXE) This will allow us to optimise the kernal for whatever processor the current machine is running. Especially optimising for 286's should give a conciderable size/speed improvement. CMD.EXE is the command line processor for windows NT, so using CMD*.EXE shouldn't cause any problems. I believe that this can give OpenDos a definate advantage in the world. Being able to use 32bit memory moves, 286+ SHL x,y, and ENTER/LEAVE should give us a smaller, faster kernal. Being able to put the kernal above the 1mb mark would give us an advantage of having almost no base ram usage. Also using a boot manager that can boot Linux would be a definate advantage. The boot manager can pass a "parameter" to the kernal, the same way that Linux does allowing for different config.sys and autoexec.bat's. This could be implemented by having some space at the beginning of the drive reserved for the bootmanager by playing with the "number of reserved sectors" in the boot sector. OR: boot a "bootman.sys" in the root directory, modification of the boot sector would therefore be minor. This program should be smart enough to display a logo, popup a nice menu with various levels. I'd also like to see a way of setting environmental varables in menu's: eg: Menu one: Load Networking : SET Networking=Yes Don't Load Networking Menu two: use QEMM : Set MemoryManager=QEMM use EMM386 : Set MemoryManager=EMM386 no memory manager. It could be argued that these could be done using DEVICE?=, except that Networks and QEMM are more than one program, it would be nice to answer "yes" or "no" and have it cover all of the associated programs. * I'm working on a TCP/IP stack, its currently 1/2 done and needs a lot more work (and a internet account to test it on fully, I'm currently using a PPP link to a Linux box as the only thing that does TCP/IP and the linux box is commonly busy). It currently does internal Loopback, Partial type 6 crynwr (Serial/PPP, its still buggy), and a bit of blue book ethernet crynwr (the bits that overlay with type 6 :), and it does UDP completely :) ICMP/TCP are yet to be written :) Perry Lorier