Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970613001019.008e1208@rpop.cs.waikato.ac.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:10:19 +1200
To: physmsa AT cantua DOT canterbury DOT ac DOT nz (Mr M S Aitchison)
From: Perry Lorier <pl5 AT waikato DOT ac DOT nz>
Subject: Re: command.com compatibility
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


>(a) what do you think OpenDOS should do - it cannot be compatible with
>    both MS options (and at present isn't compatible with either, although
>    it does do what I would think is "sensible"). Ideally there should be
>    a compatibility flag that can be set, but what should the default be?

Umm, provide support for either method using %@function[param,param] and
ignore the entire problem :)

>(b) Does anybody have a list of other undocumented COMMAND.COM "features"?

As a matter of fact: I do :) (although its at home.)