Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 14:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To: Mark Habersack <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Another look at FS notions
In-Reply-To: <199705081003.MAA23479@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970608142907.1518I-100000@capslock.com>
Organization: Capslock Computer Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 8 May 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:

> > > We could use Linux VFS specs here. They are well thought and shouldn't be
> > > hard to implement on DOS.
> > 
> > Sounds good.
> Fine. Let's dig through VFS docs then (are there any? ;-))

I haven't found anything yet besides ext2 stuff.  Anyone else
know of the whereabouts of documentation for Linux's VFS (virtual
file system)?

I'm going to go through the source tree again when I get a
chance.
 

Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca  <-- Spam proof address

EMACS: Escape Meta Alt Control Shift  :o)