Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 06:55:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: mpircher AT biosys DOT net cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: cAse sensitivity, filesystems In-Reply-To: <9705300909.AA08722@sunnm.at.cp.philips.com> Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 30 May 1997, Martin G. Pircher wrote: > I'm reading the OD lists quite for a while now, and I have to say that I'm > really getting annoyed of if the discussions about the case sensitivity > and the filesystems. So am I. > I think its a good idea to implement the common filesystems as fat, ext2, > ntfs, and the case sensitivity as well. Agreed as well. > Where's the big problem if you have to choose at the beginning of the > installation what filesystem do you want, and if you like case sensitivity? Exactly. > If OD defaults to FAT and non-case sensitivity, a standard user doesn't > have any problems, and an advanced user can choose the things he > likes/needs. Precicely. Some people just have closed minds and are stubborn, even though they are not the driving force. > The only "problem" I see is to make kernel and tools realize what options > have been installed, making work them. But other OS also deal with LFN, > some excellent as U*nix, some more crippled. The only problem that I see is coding everything. Everything should be so transparent via VFS/IFS that MSDOS 6.22 commands could copy/rename/delete/execute/whatever programs and files that reside on a case sensitive DOS ext2 partition with LFN's via name mangling. I'd say that the code allready exists in public domain or GPL, and that it just needs to be ported to DOS. VFS - linux source, other PD OS's that use VFS ext2, ntfs, hpfs, every FS under the sun - all in the linux source, as well as other OS source Name mangling code that is not brain dead - MACH. This can be found also in the DOSemu source I've looked at all of this stuff as well as the documentation on it, and have done some ext2 coding *IN DOS* in DJGPP. I'm starting to be able to read stuff into my program now from ext2. If no-one else want's it, then they won't use it, - I will, and if I get it to the state where it is useful, it will be released to OpenDOS and Caldera the volcano people. > But that's the point when coding them, and not where to choose if it generally > should be supported. That is for sure! Fortunately, the people who are "choosing" that it shouldn't and/or wont be supported, don't have much control over the people like myself who ARE going to make it exist for everyone. > If the discussion goes on in that way as it does now, you're still at the same > point in some months. "Yes I want" - "No I don't need".... True, my coding on ext2 for DOS is being neglected somewhat the last couple weeks... > Just my opinion. And a very good one as well. Take care. Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca <-- Spam proof address Want Wordperfect for Linux? Visit Caldera's website: www.caldera.com