Message-Id: <3.0.1.16.19970529081117.2d4786c4@shadow.net> Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 08:11:17 -0400 To: "Mike A. Harris" From: Ralph Proctor Subject: Re: Norte versus DEFRAG Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: References: <9705281425 DOT AA15643 AT rgfn DOT epcc DOT Edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk At 04:23 AM 5/29/97 -0400, you wrote: >Norton Calibrate is a low level format utility for older hard >disks. It is not a defragmentation tool. It is similar in >feature to SpinRite (I believe that Norton acquired SpinRite). > > >Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris >Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... >My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html >Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca <-- Spam proof address Mike: Your statement above maybe techinically correct, but I am surprised because I used for defragmentation for several years and it looked like it was doing what DEFRAG now does -- at least it appeared that way to me. Could the Norton defragger have had another name? I THOUGHT it was Calibrate. Maybe I am thinking of another tool that came with Norton Utilities that was a defragger. Are you sure that Calibrate was not intended for defragmentation? Back then, I had no trouble with Calibrate, but later I found that I had no need for any of the other utilites because better ones came along later. _____________________ Ralph Proctor Coral Gables, Florida ralphgpr AT shadow DOT net