To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: BIG suggestion for Opendos Features
Message-ID: <19970528.181332.5183.0.chambersb@juno.com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970528063625 DOT 4564H-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
From: chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 21:16:17 EDT
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 28 May 1997 06:51:14 -0400 (EDT) "Mike A. Harris"
<mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca> writes:
[snip]
>same, but no poking around into the protected address space of
>the OS, NO LOCKUPS OR REBOOTS!!!!! (Well, perhaps from a 16bit
>game running in a VM accessing DMA or something.... unless we
>emulate DMA.... hmmm.... DOSDOSEMU?  :o)
Nah... Just dmaEMU :)

>This is more of a developer topic though, so reply in
>opendos-developer if you're subscribed, and we can discuss it in
>more detail and share suggestions, thoughts, constructive
>criticisms, ideas, etc without boring opendos users to death!
>:o)
>
>TTYL
I'm not really sure whether or not I'm subscribed to Developer.  (If I
don't see this message, I'll know :)