Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 09:42:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pierre Phaneuf cc: Tim Bird , opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: DOS utilities (was Re: A few FS notions) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk This reply has been moved into opendos-developer On Mon, 5 May 1997, Pierre Phaneuf wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 1997, Tim Bird wrote: > > > This raises the general question of someone (besides Caldera) creating > > a "distribution" of OpenDOS. A careful reading of the new license > > will reveal that this is allowed. That is, redistribution of binaries and > > source for non-commercial use (and for no commercial gain) is now > > allowed. > > Before putting together a distribution with sources, we should take care > to make the thing compile with free tools... Absolutely, however in order to do so, we need to get the sources no? And who wants to download ALL of them when they'll only be fiddling with bits and pieces? I call for a "developer" distribution that is in multiple packages. What does everyone else think? Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca <-- Spam proof address Want to know how to let people connect to your computer over the internet?