Message-Id: <199705151851.OAA03626@delorie.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 13:42:03 -0500 From: "Jonathan E. Brickman" Reply-To: "Jonathan E. Brickman" To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Subject: X -- ugh Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk > To all those thinking about X on OpenDOS, *PLEASE* go to > http://ecco.bsee.swin.edu.au/unix/uh/x-windows.html and read it ALL. If at > the end of this you're still in the mood to have X in OpenDOS, take 2 > aspirins and go to bed. You can call in sick for work. I agree with everything this document said, having tried most of it at least once. In my opinion, one reason Unix is on the decline is the despicable nature of X-Windows. I find it rather humorous that people who hate Windows and love Unix are even willing to say anything about X-Windows. There are reasons few programs are ported from Windows to X, and most of those are in that document. Frankly, if OpenDOS shipped with anything X, my first step in OD installation would be to delete X. If it were an option, I'd skip it in every possible use for OD I've seen so far. Somebody needs to come up with a replacement for X, and fast. It needs to be constructed to be fairly easy to emulate Win32. X emulation would be good but not vital. It needs to be well-written. If somebody does it, I think Unix will rise again. If not, I think better operating systems will replace it, eventually. In the long run, I don't think Microsoft can do it; but in the short run, they're making progress. Jonathan E. Brickman River City Computing, Inc. (913) 232-6663 http://www.cjnetworks.com/~rivercity brickman AT cjnetworks DOT com It seems to me that men usually think more about carburetors, and women think more about doors. I think the world needs really good carburetors...and really good doors.