Message-Id: <199705101214.OAA27657@magigimmix.xs4all.nl>
From: "yeep" <yeep AT xs4all DOT nl>
To: "John Fremlin" <dfremlin AT facstaff DOT wisc DOT edu>, <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Filesystems/Wishlist (ext2)
Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 14:08:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

> I'd just like to say again: I want to be able to use FAT.
> 
> If ext2 can do this, then I want ext2 as well. However adding
> a more complex filesystem = adding a feature = adding bugs +
> adding to size of OpenDOS.
> 
> (IMHO OpenDOS has enough bugs already, thank you.)
> 
> How about two versions, an ext2 version and a FAT version?
> 
> FAT for those who want compatiblity and stability
> ext2 for people who want new features

JEZUS CHRIST, you haven't been paying attention at all have you!!!
You just for something that you don't like and bitch about that, in stead
of reading all that's been said!!!
I suggest you read thru the archives at DJ's site and look thru the entire
FS discussion, which I believe started about 4 months ago!!!
Or look thru one of the first mails that were sent on the list.
The first big argument we had on the list was: EVERYTHING IS
OPTIONAL!!!!!!!!

	Yeep