Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 16:14:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: pierre AT tycho DOT com cc: OpenDOS Mailing List Subject: Re: OpenDOS Kernel sources finally! :) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 6 May 1997, Pierre Phaneuf wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 1997, Donald Jeff Dionne wrote: > > > > DJGPP + NASM (or GAS or whatever) would do very well for 32-bit code, but > > > as DJGPP cannot do 16-bit real-mode, we've got to find a free C compiler > > > for DOS for OpenDOS/16! I didn't check LCC more when I saw that it was > > > 32-bit itself. We need a compiler that runs on less than 386. > > > > > > Micro-C anyone? It's going to be for porting from ASM anyway... > > > > "We now have the 'bcc' GPL'd K&R compiler for minix running on Linux" > > > > ftp://linux.mit.edu/ > > Yes, while bcc runs on Linux and produces 16-bit code, we'd rather develop > under DOS, right? ;-) Absolutely. OpenDOS should be compilable IN DOS, and not reliant on other OS's IMHO. Therefore I believe we MUST use a DOS compiler. This doesn't mean that OS's such as Linux can't be of help in the task though. I do my DOS programming in DOSemu sessions running 6.22 and OD. Much more stable programming environment. Also, cross compilation might be possible too, but only optionally, and not FORCED. Also, I think that we should shy away from K&R, since there are lots of ANSI compilers available, and we're taking OD into the future, not the past. Anyone? Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca <-- Spam proof address DOS must have's: 4DOS 5.50c ftp://ftp.std.com/vendors/jpsoft