Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 14:57:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: Mark Habersack cc: JP Morris , opendos AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: A few FS notions In-Reply-To: <199705060826.KAA22455@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl> Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 6 May 1997, Mark Habersack wrote: > Once upon a time (on 5 May 97 at 16:52) JP Morris said: > > > >> things much more flexible. > > > > > >My vote goes to case sensitive too... > > > > > > > Don't come running to us when all your programs break... :-) > The Old Ones, yes but the New Ones, why? We won't be running to anyone. Since we'll have the sources, and we (or someone out there) will be creating this feature, they will also make it backwards compatible. Mark, why would "the old ones" not work? Have you forgotten about the name mangler? > > I declare and maintain that Case-Sensitivity should be _optional_ > > so that I can switch it off. > > Preferably from the command-line. > Yes, that's sensible - there should also be an API to do that from inside the > application. Exactly. Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca <-- Spam proof address LINUX: The ONLY bulletproof 32-bit operating system that has it all.