Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 09:44:57 +0200 (MET DST) From: To: "Mike A. Harris" cc: OpenDOS Mailing List Subject: Re: DOS utilities (was Re: A few FS notions) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk > > I was thinking about a scheme like Red Hat RPMs, where you can get > > .i386.rpm, .alpha.rpm and .sparc.rpm, just as well as .src.rpm... > > Developers get the .src.rpm (after installing a base package that will > > install the bare minimum AND the package manager). > > Yes, sounds good, but it has to be EASIER than RPM's, and the > "RPM" file must come ready to run as either a self extracting EXE > or a ZIP file IMHO, *NOT* as an RPM file. How about a zip file renamed to rpm? :-) > Lets decide exactly what should be in the different packages. > Sound good? Here is my suggestion of what to start off with: > > (Binary dists) > > UTILITY package (16-bit OpenDOS version) > OPENDOS\DELTREE > OPENDOS\BACKUP > OPENDOS\STACKER > OPENDOS\RESTORE I assume with this package you mean all the stuff usually supplied with a DOS? Stuff like xcopy and....erm..is there more? Well, you know what I mean. So then we'd have two packages to get a full (as we are now used to for a DOS) OS. > Well, there are countless others, but this is a start. Please > add to the list, or change it in any way that you see fit. How about a package with replacements for the other two. 4DOS, BASH, CSH, etc in stead of COMMAND.COM. And some other stuff that can be replaced. > Packages should be able to be installed, removed, upgraded, > etc... all with the smart installer program. Yes, definitly! As long as the log files are in ASCII, so you can update them when you relocate or manually delete a package. (Ever tried pulling that of when you manually deleted something under Win95, in stead of with the uninstall? Registry...here I come :-) ) Yeep