Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 22:11:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pierre Phaneuf cc: Tim Bird , opendos AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: DOS utilities (was Re: A few FS notions) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 5 May 1997, Pierre Phaneuf wrote: > > This raises the general question of someone (besides Caldera) creating > > a "distribution" of OpenDOS. A careful reading of the new license > > will reveal that this is allowed. That is, redistribution of binaries and > > source for non-commercial use (and for no commercial gain) is now > > allowed. > > Before putting together a distribution with sources, we should take care > to make the thing compile with free tools... Well, I completely agree with that for NON-developers, however developers need distributions as well. Also, the binary dists should NOT come with source right now IMHO, and even later on, separate source distribs make more sense. However one shouldn't need to download 30M of source code just to get the source for SUBST either. I think that it should be broken down into several pieces such as a BASE source distrib including the kernel, as well as COMMAND.COM, and the headers for EVERYTHING, then one only need download the "ODfileutils" source, or the "OD diskutils" source, or the "driver source", etc... Similar in nature to GNU that is. Sounds good to me! TTYL Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca <-- Spam proof address Want a Windows emulator for Linux? Visit Caldera's website: www.caldera.com