Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 23:28:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: OpenDOS discussion list Subject: Re: A few FS notions In-Reply-To: <199705020619.SAA19407@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz> Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk I've just read a lot of posts concerning the "subject" line and have thought about it a lot. My conclusion is that everyone wants something new in the filesystem. This is ok and is expected. I too want new things. (ext2 for example). Not all users are going to want all of the new things however, so I think that before creating a NEW FS for OpenDOS we should really explore all of the possibilities of EXISTING filesystems. Then if no EXISTING FS does what we want, we can take the best FS and redesign it, by taking the good points from it, and good points from other FS's and adding the new stuff. 1) FAT is a BAD (Broken As Designed) floppy disk FS from the very start. 2) FAT is non-reliable 3) FAT is non-secure 4) FAT Therefore we need to look at FS's like ext2/hpfs/ntfs and use them as a design point. Although I personally think ext2 would satisfy ALL the needs of everyone, I am not fully aware of what everyone wants and what ext2 is capable of. I have read a fair bit about ext2 though and STRONGLY suggest that others read about it too. We don't want to reinvent the wheel. Now I'm going to go read all the stuff I have on ext2 before I post anything more on this thread. .... the last thing we want to add to OpenDOS is a new hacked FS like VFAT or worse.... Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca <-- Spam proof address 4DOS can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.std.com/vendors/jpsoft