Message-Id: <199705020030.UAA19370@keeper.albany.net> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Jim Lefavour" Organization: No Way Out To: Ben Schollnick , opendos AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 08:32:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: A few FS notions Reply-to: jamesl AT albany DOT net References: In-reply-to: Precedence: bulk > > On Thu, 1 May 1997, Evan Dickinson wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Benjamin D Chambers wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > What I would like to request is: > > > - Node tree (versus FAT) > > > - Case sensitivity > > > > Not being much of an UNIX user myself, I have to ask: Why is a case > > sensitive filesystem an advantage? I get frustrated when *.zip won't > > match SOMETHING.ZIP; I'm sure lots of other DOS users would, too. > > I believe the design of HPFS is better in relationship for Case > support. > > HPFS is Case-insensitive for *RETRIEVAL*, but stores the "case" > you type in for the filename... > > In otherwords, when you save the file, your also saving the > filename's case: > > IE: > > "This is a Test" > > would be stored just like that....But any filecomparision's are > case *INSENSITIVE*. > > "This is a test" == "THIS IS A TEST" == "this is a test" > > Are all the same file. Even when you save a file, it would all > work the same... (In otherwords, it still checks for the file first, and > only saves "one" case version). > > Benjamin In that matter, you could use ext2 (which is definately freely available) and create the search function so that it is case-insensitive, either by default or by command line switch... Jim jamesl AT albany DOT net http://www.albany.net/~jamesl/ Please also visit: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/9244/