Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 03:42:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT gulliver DOT qc DOT ca>
To: Mark Habersack <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: About Life, Loaders and Binary Formats...
In-Reply-To: <199704300712.JAA12818@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970430034206.30677A-100000@server.gulliver.qc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:

> That's right - as long as we talk about 32-bits there is no problem. But I 
> think that it should be possible for the 16-bit RM small utilities to take 
> full advantage of the shared librarie - we must remember that many people 
> will keep writing 16-bit RM apps. I think that we could achieve it through a 
> system of proxies /thunks/, what do you think?

What do I think? I think that I'm *not* the one coding this!!! ;-))

Pierre Phaneuf

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/CM/E/IT/MU/P/TW d-(--)pu s+:- a--- C++++$ ULC++(++++)$>++++ P+>++
L++$>+++ E>+ W+(-)$ N+ K w---$ M-- PS+ PE+ Y-- PGP- t+ X+ R+>+++ tv
b++(+) DI+(++) D++ G e(+) h(+)>++ r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------