Message-Id: <199704300713.JAA12958@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Mark Habersack" Organization: PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins) To: Jonathan Purvis Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:14:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: File Systems (was Re: Usage of directory entries Reply-to: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl CC: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl, alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com References: <862258398 DOT 1011862 DOT 0 AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> In-reply-to: Precedence: bulk Once upon a time (on 29 Apr 97 at 11:47) Jonathan Purvis said: > > The mounting is done invisibly. Typing a: is just a change directory; we > > don't have to type "a:" when a new disk is inserted, we just type DIR > > again, or whatever we want from the disk. There is no operation that has > > to be taken to inform the system of disk changes because it knows, all on > > it's own! > > Well, on an XT, there is no disk change sensor, so DOS has to re-mount > the disk everytime it accesses it. On an AT, there is a disk change line, > so it can keep a copy of the FAT and directories in memory. This is how > things like Norton Backup can automagically know when a disk is put in. Yes, also diskdupe uses that technique. But still, DOS updates its internal structures on every access to a floppy. ------------------- Are we trigger happy? Russian roulette in the waiting room. Empty chambers embracing the end, puzzled visions haunt the ripples of a trevi moon, dream coins for the fountain or to cover your eyes... We reached the ignition point from the sparks of plasantries. Sensed the smoke advancing from horizons - you must've know that I was considering an escape... ----