Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 23:18:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT dilu DOT ml DOT org>
Reply-To: pierre AT tycho DOT com
To: Mark Habersack <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: About Life, Loaders and Binary Formats...
In-Reply-To: <199704281118.NAA24068@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970428231659.336B-100000@dilu.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:

> > Don't know about why Intel put this in... But I think there is no
> > practical way that I know of to create 16-bit shared libraries, in
> Why? And what about NE OS/2 and Win3.xx DLLs?

Hmm... Darn! I was thinking about protected mode, not simply 16-bit... But
why do 16-bit shared libraries (in 16-bit protected mode)? While we're
doing pmode, let's go 32-bit, no?

Pierre Phaneuf