Message-Id: <199704281117.NAA23987@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <grendel@[150.254.113.14]>
From: "Mark Habersack" <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization: PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
To: Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 13:17:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl,
        "Alaric B. Williams" <alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>,
        Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <m0wL68C-000FogC@hn.planet.gen.nz>
Precedence: bulk

Once upon a time (on 26 Apr 97 at 23:59) Lorier said:

> >Linux is for hackers, but
> >OpenDOS must be for mere users, too. People who don't want to learn about
> >drivers and filing systems - they wanna start up Word Perfect and go...
> 
> EXACTLY!
OK, but where's the problem? Is it so hard to achieve, to link the two 
things: friendliness and advanced, "power user" features?
==================================================
Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye
Stand straight, we drifted past the point of
  reasons why.
Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today
And the problems seem to be we're picking up the
  pieces of a ricochet...