Comments: Authenticated sender is <alaric+abwillms AT sdps DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
From: "Alaric B. Williams" <alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
To: pierre AT tycho DOT com
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 21:59:26 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to: alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
CC: OpenDOS Developer Mailing List <opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com>
References: <m0wLGUm-000FllC AT hn DOT planet DOT gen DOT nz>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970427031529.2823C-100000@dilu.ml.org>
Message-ID: <862174556.067706.0@abwillms.demon.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On 27 Apr 97 at 3:31, Pierre Phaneuf wrote:

> Red Hat 4.1 blows both Win 95 and Win NT to smithereens. In every aspects.

I'd beg to disagree - I gave up on installing Red Hat 4.1 a few days 
ago after banging my head against the thing for several hours. Purged
my partition table of it's unwholesome presence. I'm already having a
long discussion with Mike Harris, a diehard Linux fan (hi, Mike :-)
about this, so don't clutter the list with another defence of Linux,
please - private email if you diagree; I'll forward you my discussion
with Mike if you want - it's long!
 
> Pierre Phaneuf

ABW
--
Alaric B. Williams (alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk)

   ---<## OpenDOS FAQ ##>---

Plain HTML: http://www.delorie.com/opendos/faq/
            http://www.deltasoft.com/faq.html

Fancy HTML: http://www.deltasoft.com/faq0000.html