Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 19:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT gulliver DOT qc DOT ca>
To: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: About Life, Loaders and Binary Formats...
In-Reply-To: <199704251241.OAA11862@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970425192822.14396E-100000@server.gulliver.qc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:

> No problem ;-) But why would Intel bother with ELF (asking just out of 
> curiosity). Speaking of ELF - would it be possible to create 16-bit shared 
> libraries in that format?

Don't know about why Intel put this in... But I think there is no
practical way that I know of to create 16-bit shared libraries, in
whatever format. And if it *is* possible, I guess it could be done with
ELF...

Pierre Phaneuf

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/CM/E/IT/MU/P/TW d-(--)pu s+:- a--- C++++$ ULC++(++++)$>++++ P+>++
L++$>+++ E>+ W+(-)$ N+ K w---$ M-- PS+ PE+ Y-- PGP- t+ X+ R+>+++ tv
b++(+) DI+(++) D++ G e(+) h(+)>++ r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------