Message-Id: <199704210823.KAA06827@math.amu.edu.pl>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <grendel@[150.254.113.14]>
From: "Mark Habersack" <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization: PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
To: Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 10:24:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC: Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <m0wIORL-000FjwC@hn.planet.gen.nz>
Precedence: bulk

Once upon a time (on 19 Apr 97 at 12:55) Lorier said:

> >> Is it just me, but if MS have hooks in that there applications can use
> >> but other peoples applications can not, then M'Soft are breaking a few
> >> laws are they not? :)
> >DOes that surprise you!?!? It was a long time ago Micro$loth was accused of
> >such practices!
> 
> No, not at all.  I've seen pieces of Code that do all sorts of nasty things.
> (winNT not running on anything but an intel processor, no reason why, it
> just won't...)... Except it seems to me that Stac could have slapped them
> with "hey thats not allowed" suit or sometihng :)
There was something like this AFAIR. But Stac has used the normal RPL 
technology allowed for everyone AFAIK?
==================================================
Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye
Stand straight, we drifted past the point of
  reasons why.
Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today
And the problems seem to be we're picking up the
  pieces of a ricochet...