Message-Id: <199704190245.WAA28617@keeper.albany.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <jamesl AT mail DOT albany DOT net>
From: "James Lefavour" <jamesl AT mail DOT albany DOT net>
To: pierre AT tycho DOT com, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com, grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 10:47:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to: jamesl AT albany DOT net
In-reply-to: <m0wIORZ-000FkaC@hn.planet.gen.nz>
Precedence: bulk

> >> What are they currently?  And how different is NASM? the difference of AT&T
> >> -> Intel? or is it just formatting? :)
> >OD sources use TASM (several versions), RASM (an internal DRI assembler) and
> >MASM (also several versions). All Intel syntax.
> 
> They didn't get the rights to RASM perhaps? Hmm... Ah well, possibly write a
> TASM klone and port everything to that :)

Now _THAT'S_ an excellent idea! But who's up to the "challenge"? (Has 
the time, desire, and talent?)

Jim