Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 15:19:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
Reply-To: pierre AT tycho DOT com
cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96.970418152630.22800E-100000@hoth.amu.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970418151815.27261F-100000@55-174.hy.cgocable.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:

> NASM should gain some features before it becomes a really powerful assembler -
> namely macro support!

Ok, so what now? GAS (GNU AS)? A86?

> > thing that should be done when the OpenDOS sources are done would be to
> > convert all the assembler sources we can find to NASM. Whew! Most of the
> > DOS internals are in asm, so I guess there is a lot of code to translate!
> But the ASM formats are really weird in DOS

The ASM formats? What do you mean? The sources or the binaries? If you're
thinking about the binaries, this is mostly a linker problem, no?

Pierre Phaneuf