Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 11:54:45 -0400
From: rick AT gbso DOT net
Message-Id: <199704181554.LAA10726@delorie.com>
To: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
Precedence: bulk


On 1997-04-18 grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl said:
   >On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
   >> >> Again, that's not the size what matters. And I cannot use
   >>DJGPP for the  >> same reason as stated above.
   >> > Hmm... We definately need a standard set of compilers :)
   >> And from what I've heard, the OpenDOS sources needs a gazillion
   >>compilers  to build... Yes, definitely, we'd need some standard
   >>free compilers! I  don't know of good 16-bit C compilers for free
   >>(in the GPL sense), but for  assembler we could use NASM like Mark
   >is already doing. One of the first NASM should gain some features
   >before it becomes a really powerful assembler - namely macro
   >support!
Was advised recently by one of NASM's developers, that a new version,
0.94 is about to be released with support for conditional assembly.
Don't know about macro support.


`[1;36;42mNet-Tamer V 1.06X - Registered