Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:13:13 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Mark Habersack <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Reply-To: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
To: -= ArkanoiD =- <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
cc: lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
In-Reply-To: <AA1-fLpW27@mpak.convey.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.96.970418161248.23833B-100000@hoth.amu.edu.pl>
Organization: PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:

> > I think that we should just do ext2 (But I'm subtly biased).  Leave FAT for
> > dead (and Microsoft) :)
> 
> I'm afraid ext2fs consumes too much RAM when accessed.. But it is ok as
> optional fs..
Why worry about RAM? We'd use DPMS for the driver - all would go to XMS!