Message-Id: <m0wIAPO-000FmFC@hn.planet.gen.nz>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 97 21:56 NZST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
From: Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
Cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 01:09 AM 18/04/97 +0300, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:
>nuqneH,
>
>> From: Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
>> Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
>> Cc: pierre AT tycho DOT com, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
>[dd]
>> >> Would extremely interesting! Both LFN and symlinks!
>> >That's the idea!
>>
>> I think that we should just do ext2 (But I'm subtly biased).  Leave FAT for
>> dead (and Microsoft) :)
>
>I'm afraid ext2fs consumes too much RAM when accessed.. But it is ok as
>optional fs..

Does it? Hmm, thats a pity :)  We can't just shove it into EMS or so?
(Personally I think most of the OS should be stored above 640 as possible now)