To: pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca
Cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970417091743 DOT 27086D-100000 AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
Message-Id: <ACF4gLpW27@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization: International Brownian Movement
From: "-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 97 01:15:43 +0300
Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
Lines: 24
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

nuqneH,

> From: Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
> Reply-To: pierre AT tycho DOT com
> cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
[dd]
> On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Lorier wrote:
>
> >> Again, that's not the size what matters. And I cannot use DJGPP for the
> >> same reason as stated above.
> > Hmm... We definately need a standard set of compilers :)
>
> And from what I've heard, the OpenDOS sources needs a gazillion compilers
> to build... Yes, definitely, we'd need some standard free compilers! I
> don't know of good 16-bit C compilers for free (in the GPL sense),

btw gcc requires 32-bit machine to run but it *can* produce 16-bit or even
8-bit code - so why djgpp can not?

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|