Message-Id: <199704151102.NAA28304@math.amu.edu.pl> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Mark Habersack" Organization: PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins) To: Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 13:02:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries Reply-to: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl CC: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: Once upon a time (on 14 Apr 97 at 19:01) Matthias Paul said: > Hi! > > To introduce better compatibility with FAT partitions also used > by Windows95 with it's LFN-support, we'd need to improve some of > the OpenDOS' utilities in this respect. For a start, I have > merged an overview of the usage of directory entries by the > various 'DOS' systems. Using some more 'intelligent' algorithms > also decoding the context of an entry, it should be possible to It is possible to tell the LFN from SFN entry by just looking at the starting cluster field which in LFN is always zero. To confirm we're dealing with LFN it is also possible to check the attributes of an entry: 0xFF for LFN. > decide LFN-entries from normal directory entries, while still > maintaining compatibility with "DR DOS"-features, which use the > same entries, but in a different context. However, for full > LFN-support we should better slightly modify the usage of these > structures... I've just started to write a TSR to provide LFN support. As soon as it has some shape, I will make it available for all to review and improve. > FYI: [snip] > proved. > > More detailed info on the usage of these structures can be found in > NWDOSTIP.TXT (from my MPDOSTIP.ZIP) and in Ralf Brown's interrupt > list INTER53+. Great info! Thanx! > Bye, > > Matthias P.S. Could you send me MPDOSTIP.ZIP by email? I was unable to ftpsearch it anywhere?? ================================================== Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye Stand straight, we drifted past the point of reasons why. Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today And the problems seem to be we're picking up the pieces of a ricochet...