Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 02:33:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To: -= ArkanoiD =- <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: 1 question about the future of OpenDos
In-Reply-To: <AAUr1Kpe27@mpak.convey.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970413023241.1321M-100000@capslock.com>
Organization: Total disorganization.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Sun, 13 Apr 1997, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:

> > I think that OpenDOS is something that has been needed for a long
> > time.  Multitasking under DOS (Desqview/Topview/Windows/etc) has
> > never been what it should be, and the OD multitasking looks good
> > so far, it still has a way to go though.
> >
> 
> Already *does* look good? You mean taskmgr? Or future oDOS-CDOS merge -
> if it happens?

I was refering to the way the taskmgr actually SAVES screens
before switching tasks.  DESQview usually destroyed graphics
screens.


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

LINUX: The ONLY bulletproof 32-bit operating system that has it all.