To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970412020752 DOT 309T-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Message-Id: <AAUr1Kpe27@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization: International Brownian Movement
From: "-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 97 02:40:14 +0300
Subject: Re: 1 question about the future of OpenDos
Lines: 23
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

nuqneH,

> From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> X-Sender: root AT capslock DOT com
> Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> To: Laurent Dei-Cas <ldeicas AT reporters DOT net>
> cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: 1 question about the future of OpenDos
[dd]
>
> I think that OpenDOS is something that has been needed for a long
> time.  Multitasking under DOS (Desqview/Topview/Windows/etc) has
> never been what it should be, and the OD multitasking looks good
> so far, it still has a way to go though.
>

Already *does* look good? You mean taskmgr? Or future oDOS-CDOS merge -
if it happens?

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|