Date: Fri, 4 Apr 1997 18:58:22 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To: "Jonathan E. Brickman" <brickman AT cjnetworks DOT com>
cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [opendos] Wishlist v2.0
In-Reply-To: <1351983702-40453399@mailhost.kspress.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970404185650.1353P-100000@capslock.com>
Organization: Total disorganization.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 4 Apr 1997, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:

> > I'm on the freewin95 mailing list and they are still planning and
> > such.  So far all that has been done is surveys and assignments
> > of various project co-ordinators.  It seems to be a very slow
> > project that is not very sure where they want to go with it.
> 
> Yes.  The originator of the project does not respond to emails
> to either of the addresses on the web site.  The Freedows98
> project (another project along the same lines) is actually
> considerably stronger, but I'm not sure how strong.  I personally
> am not sure either of them really matter, given Java futures.

Hmmm.  That certainly is an interesting thought!  If Java apps
start coming out and are worthwhile and useful, then you use DOS,
he uses W95, joe blow uses NT, I use Linux, and we all use the
same Java app.  I like that idea.


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

DJGPP: Current version 2.01