Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 17:16:32 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: yeep cc: billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz, "'OpenDOS newsgroup'" Subject: Re: [opendos] Reply-to fields In-Reply-To: <199703230154.CAA13229@magigimmix.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 23 Mar 1997, yeep wrote: > > > > > > > > > We COULD start talking about porting a good netmail reader > to > > > > > opendos, I > > > > > > > > > mean, we want just about everything else included with the > OS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kitchen sink anyone? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PINE is available for about 9000 OS's including DOS > (PC-PINE). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been wondering about Pine, how would I set it up to work > in a > > > > > > > non-network setup using local files instead? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm working on porting the kitchen sink to OpenDOS right now. > > > Anyone > > > > > > > > care to beta test it for me? You'll need a couple glasses, a > > > bucket > > > > > and > > > > > > > > some soap. :o) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm busy compiling glasses right now, I'll get back with you on > > > this. > > > > > I > > > > > > > seem to keep breaking the soap OS with random code fragments. > > > > > > > > > > > > I've got the bucket, but there's a hole in it. > > > > > > > > > > Oh, well I've got an update for you. > > > > > A patch that'll remove the 'hole-bug' > > > > > If you run into any problems applying the patch, let me know, I had > > > some > > > > > trouble installing a handle on the bucket afterwards, but now my > code > > > is > > > > > water-tight. > > > > > > > > > > Yeep > > > > > > > > Unfortunatly, my axe is blunt, and there's no water for the stone... > > > > > > > > But then again, if you code is as water-tight as you say, can it be > > > > shaped into a bucket? > > > > > > No, the code is a patch for the bucket, so the hole is.....patched. > > > And why are you using an axe? > > > Why not upgrade to a chainsaw? > > > > > > Yeep > > > > The axe is to cut the patch to the right size. > > I have no fuel for the chainsaw and my bucket has a hole in it... > > So you got an cheap upgrade to the chainsaw (without the fuel)? > And you're bucket is also a bit different because the patch isn't correct. > Hmmm....you wouldn't be one of them optimizers, who change their bucket to > fit personal needs now would you? > In that case you'll have to make your own patch, based on mine. No yeep, he got the Micro$uck chainsaw upgrade. We all know it by it's more widely used name: Windows. The REAL chainsaw module will completely remove the old chainsaw, and make the system run more smoothly and take up less space. I'm actually being quite serious about this: About a year ago I wrote a utility for DOS called "CHAINSAW.EXE" which destroys all of the SHIT files from Win3.1/Win3.11/WFW3.11/DOS6.20-6.22. It uses a couple configuration files that need only be configured once, then you merely type "CHAINSAW WFW311 C:\WINDOWS" after installing it. Perhaps I could give my sources to Caldera? Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca URL: Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com