From: "Matthias Paul" Organization: IBH, RWTH-Aachen To: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 21:40:09 GMT+0100 Subject: Re: Interactive shells Re: 32bit BIOS Reply-to: Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de Message-ID: <4BE7B5F84@ibh.rwth-aachen.de> On Sat, 22 Mar 97, "-= ArkanoiD =-" (what's your *real* name?) wrote: > > From: "yeep" > > To: , [Archives mounted in the file system, Internet access with UNC] > > This would be cool, though I'm already capable of doing so in Norton > > Comnmander 5.0. > > I don't think it would be cool.. Why not? What's so bad with the idea? If you don't want it, just don't use it, and it won't cost you memory, speed, whatsoever... I must admit, it would be slow if for maximum compatibility using we'd use the original 3rd party archivers, but, of course, we could write specialized programs for common archivers like ZIP/ARJ/RAR/LHA. These would be faster, since there was no a big overhead due to the permanent shelling/initializing of the external utilities. > and i don't like Norton Commander 5.0 - it > is huge,slow and stupid. Volcov Commander + ARCview is smaller, > faster and (imho) offers better interface. Hm, speaking of alternatives, what's about the DOS Navigator [DN]: It's small (compared to NC), similar speed compared to the NC, better link funktions, better archiver support, better editor, 4DOS support, open end flexiblity, much more... [For those of you, who don't know the DN III 1.50 right now, I have included a pointer to their site on my web page.] Bye, Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------ Matthias Paul ! My eMail address has changed. For some time ! Ubierstrasse 28 ! mails to former ! D-50321 BRUEHL ! will be forwarded to the new address. ! eMail: WWW : URL: http://www.rhrz.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/mpdokeng.html ------------------------------------------------------------------