Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 21:07:27 -0600 (CST)
From: "Colin W. Glenn" <cwg01 AT gnofn DOT org>
To: "'OpenDOS newsgroup'" <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject: Re: [opendos] Shared Libraries (was: FSSTND)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970321102230.30192C-100000@unicorn.it.wsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970321210258.23040E-100000@sparkie.gnofn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Evan Dickinson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Alaric B. Williams wrote:

> Just one minor nitpick:  When we get shared libraries, we should probably
> use a different extension than DLL.  If we use a different extension,
> it'll be easier to tell Windows DLLs from the OpenDOS variety.

DSR?  Dynamically Shared Resource
DSL?	"	    "	 Library
MPR?  Multi-Program Resource
MPI?	"	"   Interface
RTE?  Run-Time Extension (interface/library/resource)

I could keep going till I find one which strikes a chord here.

> Other suggestions:
>  - ODL (OpenDOS Library)
>  - SHL (Shared Library)
> 
-- 
Promise Keepers		<a href="http://www.promisekeepers.org/">.</a><br>
DJ Delorie's Home Page		<a href="http://www.delorie.com/">.</a><br>
Caldera, Inc. / OpenDOS		<a href="http://www.caldera.com/">.</a><br>