Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 05:45:25 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: Matt Adam cc: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Subject: Re: [opendos] newsgroup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Matt Adam wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > > > At 07:01 PM 3/16/97 -0800, you wrote: > > >does anyone else think it's about time to push for an opendos newsgroup? > > >what all is involved in setting one up? > > > > It would be *nice*, but is it really necessary? What does a > > newsgroup due that this cannot? Also, I think there is a certain group > > where one proposes a new group and to which hierarchy it should go, etc. > > > > well, i would prefer a newsgroup because i think it's a lot easier to > follow article flow than e-mail flow of messages that were deleted days > ago.. plus, i like to keep my e-mail clutter-free for important messages > only. i mean, it's not a major inconvenience to be on a mailing list, i > would just prefer a newsgroup I prefer mailing lists myself, but if traffic was doubled, then I'd use the newsgroup. As for keeping your inbox uncluttered, just use a front end mail processor such as procmail to presort your mail into different folders. Assuming of course that you use Linux that is. You *DO* use Linux don't you??!?!?! > as for the hierarchy.. wouldn't comp.os.opendos be appropriate? i'm > fairly ignorant when it comes to advanced newsgroup hierarchies :) comp.os.opendos.announce comp.os.opendos.misc comp.os.opendos.help comp.os.opendos.??? TTYL Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca LINUX: What changed from 2.0.27 to 2.0.28? I don't notice anything.