Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 22:06:10 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike A. Harris" Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" To: Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de cc: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Subject: Re: [opendos] Wishlist v2.0 In-Reply-To: <38EEF715C46@ibh.rwth-aachen.de> Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Precedence: bulk On Fri, 14 Mar 1997, Matthias Paul wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 1997 21:58:49, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > > ... The utilities will be the first to be ported. Have > > you ever tried to sort a file > 64k? SUCKS!!!!!!!! > > You're right when speaking of MS-DOS/PC-DOS, but fortunately > Novell DOS (and probably OpenDOS, too) have no problems with > pipes greater 64KB, e.g. with SORT, MORE, FIND. Of course, > you need enough swap space for temp files... > > (Some of these 64KB limitations have been fixed in current > versions of MS-DOS/PC-DOS, either... They learn slowly, but... ;-) ) Well, I'm using DOS 6.22 & OpenDOS. I don't know about OpenDOS but 6.22 DOESN'T allow > 64k. Either way, a 32bit protected mode version of all of the utilities would be very useful to SOME of us who do want it. Since someone is bound to port the stuff to DJGPP, there is little point in arguing about wether or not it is really needed or not. I doubt that it would be very hard to port the stuff to DJGPP anyways. In fact, I'm sure most stuff would port easily. Some stuff would probably just directly compile into DJGPP with no modification. That's my opinion anyway. I'll probably port some of the stuff myself if no-one else is. TTYL Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom... My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca LINUX: The ONLY bulletproof 32-bit operating system that has it all.