Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 19:52:34 -0600 (CST) From: "Colin W. Glenn" To: "'OpenDOS newsgroup'" Subject: Re: [opendos] Wishlist v2.0 In-Reply-To: <199703142103.OAA13180@caldera.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Precedence: bulk I've got to agree with you in many places, a 32 bit OS would scream, and you could always write a DRMI driver. (Dos Real Mode Interface!) On Fri, 14 Mar 1997, Tim Bird wrote: > > >>>10] Make the source compilable by one compiler and linker (not our > > >>This is definitely needed. But not DJGPP. DJGPP is a 32-bit > > >And yet, isn't a 32bit DPMI OS which utilizes V86 consoles _definitely_ > > >what we want? The only problem is the overhead - for just the kernel, > > >though, and without any external crap (sound, graphics, et cetera, > > >they're all drivers) the kernel shouldn't be too bad. > > > > DOS is a 16-bit real-mode operating system. It is *not* a 32-bit protected > > mode operating system. If you want a 32-bit protected mode operating system, > > use Linux or Demos or something. If you want to try to convert DOS into a > > 32-bit protected mode operating system then it won't be DOS. > I agree in part. I don't have aything less than a 386 anymore, so I > wouldn't be bothered by a 32-bit kernel or utilities. Because it is > an important market, the 16-bit code should continue to be supported. > It should be possible support both in the code (conditional code) > in many places, and use install-time or run-time checks to use > appropriate code. You don't have to substantially change DOS as an > OS to benefit from some 32-bit code. DJGPP A Free GNU C & more compiler ! DJ Delorie's Home Page . A Christian Web Site! The Light .
A neat place to visit. HotSpot .
Caldera, Inc. / Makers of OpenDOS .
Caldera's OpenDOS page .