From: jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:14:57 -0500 (EST) To: yeep Cc: "'OpenDOS newsgroup'" Subject: Re: [opendos] [OpenDOS] Wishlist part 2 In-Reply-To: <199703010205.DAA21657@magigimmix.xs4all.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Precedence: bulk Would prove a problem for speech synthesizer equipped systems as well unless characters were either spoken as numbers or descriptor strings were associated with each character such that when a cursor was moved on top of a character either the number or descriptor string were spoken. On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, yeep wrote: > >Why not sticky key facilities for the alt key such that if a particular > >combination is used it toggles them on and off. Maybe alt-s, don't know > >since > >someone else may already use that combination. Once the sticky keys are > >on > >any key that's not on the number pad that's hit generates an error beep. > >The sticky key mode could also adjust the numlock state as well. > >once that's done, we're down to logical selection of numbers for > >functions. > >One question I have is whether numbers could be entered higher than 256 > >and if so could any > >response be elicited from those entries once done. If that's possible > >the feasible limit is 256-999 and > >our sticky key mode might automatically add that 255 to every value > >entered to help provide a little > >user protection too. I know mskermit has some pretty unique scan codes > >that it uses and generates so this might be possible. > > Why not use the same facility my organizer does? > Let's say that pressing a certain key combo (ctrl-alt-s, for instance) > loads a special font (with possibly more than 256 chars) and a selection > menu. > You then select the special character you want. > This way you won't need to remember all those funny numerical values of all > those funny chars. > > I think this could prove a problem for gui's and stuff, though. > But it's just an idea > > Yeep > > jude